Back to Home
The ConsortiumPerformance AssessmentActivismConsequences of Testing
One Size Does Not Fit All

Legal Action

Legislative Agenda

Censorship: The ELA Exposed
Censored Works
The Paper Trail

Censorship: The ELA Exposed
The Paper Trail: Correspondence about censorship

January 6, 2003

Dr. Richard P. Mills
Commissioner of Education
The State Education Department
89 Washington Avenue
Albany, NY 12234

Robert M. Bennett
Chancellor, New York State Board of Regents
201 Millwood Lane
Tonawanda, NY 14150

John R. Kuhl, Chair
State Senate Education Committee
310 Legislative Office Building
Albany, NY 12247

Steven Sanders, Chair
State Assembly Education Committee
201 East 16th St.
New York, NY 10003

Dear Commissioner Mills, Chancellor Bennett, Senator Kuhl, and Assemblyman Sanders:

We have previously written to object to the routine censorship of literary passages on New York State English Language Arts Regents exams, which is questionable on pedagogical, intellectual and legal grounds. In our earlier correspondence, we documented numerous examples in which material was deleted apparently to eliminate any reference to race, religion, ethnicity, or other "sensitive" or potentially controversial subjects.

We were gratified when the Commissioner, Chancellor, and other officials recognized, in Assemblyman Steve Sanders' words, that this was an "ill conceived policy" and that "new guidelines" would "ensure that this practice not be continued in future Regents Exams, as follows:

  • words or phrases will not be deleted or changed in passages
  • complete paragraphs or sections of a piece of literature will be used
  • deletions of paragraphs for length will be indicated
  • the author and title will always be cited
  • the former "sensitivity guidelines" will not be used and that
  • accountability has been changed to ensure these directives are carried out."
The Commissioner announced that these changes were already in place and would be reflected in the June exam. Our review, however, indicates this did not occur. At least three passages were expurgated: an excerpt about the Dust Bowl, an article about the sleep habits of teenagers, and a short story by Isaac Asimov were altered, without indication, based on "sensitive" content.

The Department of Education had ample time to correct the problem before the August exam, but again failed to do so. Each section contains at least one passage plainly edited to delete certain types of content, including references to death, violence, religion, and errors by government officials. The terms "male menopause," "sex appeal," and "antique syringe" were likewise expunged. Ellipses appeared in some cases to indicate that material had been deleted, but not in all.

As before, many of the deletions materially distorted the meaning of the passages, in some cases making it difficult or impossible to answer the questions posed. A literary passage attributed to Kafka is virtually unrecognizable to anyone who had read the original; instead of the "complete paragraph" promised by the State Education Department, the exam sanitizes the first and last sentences of Kafka's original paragraph and removes the middle three sentences entirely. Other alterations were merely inaccurate, resulting in the mis-attribution of authorship, incorrect titles, and other errors.

As public officials responsible for the education of New York's students, you have been singularly unresponsive to the deficiencies in the exams you require students ? our children ? to take in order to graduate from high school. Chancellor Bennett has refused either to meet with concerned members of the public or to hold public hearings on these admitted problems in the Regents exams. He instead stated that "he and the Board of Regents are satisfied that Commissioner Mills is dealing appropriately with the matter...." Whether the public should share his and the Board's confidence is another matter.

Assemblyman Sanders stated that "accountability has been changed to ensure that these [new] directives are carried out." The question is: what accountability? The Commissioner reports to the Board of Regents, and the Board reports - apparently - to no one.

This archaic and undemocratic system has serious consequences for New York students. The time is long past for public hearings to address the lack of accountability in New York's educational policy-making system and its effects on the quality of education.

Please send any response to Joan Bertin at the National Coalition Against Censorship and Donna Lieberman at the New York Civil Liberties Union.

American Booksellers Foundation for Free Expression
American Israeli Civil Liberties Coalition
American Library Association Office for Intellectual Freedom
Americans for Democratic Action, NYC Chapter
Association of American Publishers
Center for First Amendment Rightso Feminists for Free Expression
Freedom to Read Foundation
Judy Blume
National Center for Fair & Open Testing (FairTest)
National Coalition Against Censorship
National Council of Teachers of English
New York Civil Liberties Union
New York Performance Standards Consortium
Parents' Coalition Against High Stakes Testing
Peacefire
PEN American Center
People For the American Way Foundation

Back



New York State students in independent, private schools are not required to take and pass the Regents exams in order to graduate. In fact, these schools refuse to administer the Regents exams because they would be forced to teach toward these tests and to abandon their own rich curricula.
NY Times, November 24, 1999